Federal Trade Commission staff says an advertised vehicle price should include every dealer-required fee and should be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only charges that a government requires the consumer to pay directly.
The automobile pricing-transparency FAQs published September 15 address mandatory document fees, conditional rebates, price prominence, third-party listings, inventory availability, optional products and communications ranging from websites and social media to phone calls and text messages.
The document is not a new regulation. The FTC says it represents staff views, is not binding on the public or the Commission and cannot determine whether a particular advertisement is lawful without considering its full factual context.
Why it matters
The guidance reaches beyond a dealership's own website. FTC staff applies the same pricing principle to inventory-search pages, vehicle-detail pages, third-party marketplaces, paid and social advertising, printed material, roadside signs, phone conversations and text messages.
That makes price accuracy a systems problem as well as an advertising decision. A correct figure in the DMS or desking tool can become misleading if a website provider, inventory feed, agency, marketplace or OEM program removes a required fee, elevates a conditional discount or displays an outdated availability status.
The FTC also makes prominence part of the analysis. Merely placing the generally available price somewhere on the page may not be enough when an MSRP or conditional figure attracts more attention. Dealers need to review the overall impression a reasonable shopper receives.
Mandatory fees belong in the advertised price under the staff view
The FAQs distinguish between charges a government requires a consumer to pay directly and charges a dealer requires as a condition of buying the vehicle. Staff says only the first category may be excluded from the advertised price.
A mandatory document fee therefore should be included in full, even when state law authorizes the fee or requires it to be disclosed separately. The FTC gives an example in which a $40,000 vehicle carrying a mandatory $85 document fee should be advertised at $40,085.
State requirements still apply. Because documentary-fee statutes and advertising rules differ, dealers should have qualified counsel determine how to present the total price while also satisfying state-specific wording, itemization and disclosure obligations.
Conditional discounts cannot become the base advertised price
Dealers may advertise rebates and discounts, but FTC staff says the most prominent figure should remain the price available to any consumer. A military, first-responder, loyalty or dealer-financing discount available only to qualifying shoppers should not be used to create the principal advertised price.
Negotiation remains permissible, and a customer may pay less than advertised. The staff position is that a dealer cannot advertise a lower number that an ordinary buyer cannot obtain without satisfying an unstated or limited condition.
The same analysis extends to installed products. Optional accessories or protection products may be offered, but the guidance warns against representing an optional product as mandatory or adding a charge the customer did not accept.
Inventory status and third-party displays require oversight
Vehicles advertised while in transit or stored offsite should be plainly identified as not physically present, according to the FAQs. Recently sold or otherwise unavailable inventory should not be used to attract a shopper and redirect that person to a higher-priced vehicle.
FTC staff says dealers, third-party advertisers and OEMs can each be responsible when they control an advertisement. Dealers should provide accurate data to vendors and take the steps within their control to ensure the generally available price appears most prominently.
That makes feed testing and exception monitoring essential. Stores should compare the source price with live inventory pages, marketplace listings, search advertisements, social campaigns and CRM communications instead of assuming every downstream display preserves the original data.
What the FAQs do—and do not—change
The FTC describes price transparency as a longstanding Section 5 obligation and does not announce a future compliance date or grace period. The agency previously sent warning letters to 97 dealership groups in March encouraging reviews of advertised prices and mandatory charges.
At the same time, the September document is staff guidance rather than a binding Commission rule. It does not revive the vacated CARS Rule, announce a new enforcement case, set a new civil-penalty schedule or decide that a named dealer or advertising template violates the law.
The legality of an advertisement remains fact-specific and depends on its net impression. The checklist below is an operational starting point, not a substitute for legal advice or a guarantee of compliance.
AI-assisted reporting disclosure
This article was researched and generated with AI-assisted systems using the references listed below. Dealership Tech Report applies automated accuracy and risk checks, but legal interpretations and agency guidance can change. Dealers should review the cited FTC material with qualified counsel before changing advertising or fee practices.
The September FAQs express FTC staff views and are not binding on the public or the Commission. They do not create a new rule, revive the vacated CARS Rule or establish that any specific advertisement is lawful or unlawful. Advertising is evaluated from its overall net impression and specific facts. State documentary-fee, advertising, leasing and financing requirements continue to apply; dealerships should obtain qualified legal advice.
Cited references
- Federal Trade Commission — FTC Publishes Price Transparency FAQs for Auto Dealers — Federal agency announcement; published Sep. 15, 2026
- Federal Trade Commission — Automobile Industry Pricing Transparency: FAQs — Nonbinding FTC staff guidance; dated September 2026
- Federal Trade Commission — FTC Warns 97 Auto Dealership Groups About Deceptive Pricing — Federal agency announcement; published Mar. 13, 2026
